Why doesn’t Apple want you to use AirTag to locate animals?

AirTag as an animal tracker? Apple advises against it, although the manufacturer’s explanation is not entirely clear

When Apple introduced AirTag, pet owners were startled at the thought of being able to track their furry pupils. Who wouldn’t want a dog or a cat to join the Apple ecosystem? A small lozenge seems perfect for attaching to a collar. Accessory manufacturers did not sit still and the market was flooded with strings and hangers intended to attach AirTag to pets. Numerous photos appeared on social media with classified ads dangling under the necks of pets. All these actions completely ignore the fact that Apple does not recommend using AirTag as an animal finder. Why? The Cupertino company does not specify this.

No one can stop you from tracking your pet with AirTag, but…

AirTags are designed to track different types of items. You can attach them to your keys, put them in a wallet pocket or put them in a backpack. In this regard, they work quite well (although not always effective). So it’s no wonder that many users have come up with the idea of ​​a convenient way to track pets through the Find network. The problem is that Apple’s official position makes it clear that the device is not intended for that. However, when looking for more detailed information about the reasons for this decision, it turns out that Apple has not provided such data. They are very careful and conservative about it. Using the phrases “I do not recommend” or “not recommended” on the one hand, you can wash your hands in case of a disorderly situation, but on the other hand, it does not discourage you from buying, because the money register correct and the pet owner is liable, if applicable. The only comment from Apple I could find on this was from its vice president of marketing Kaiann Dance:

When people do this, all they need to do is make sure the moving pet is within range of the device on the “Find” network so its location can be tracked

AirTag does not emit waves that – at least according to current knowledge – could be dangerous for the animal. So technically it is possible, but Apple does not recommend it anyway. Let’s see why.

Source: Depositphotos

The first thing that comes to mind is the average effectiveness of such a solution. AirTags use the signal broadcast by nearby iPhones. So if the animal runs away from the house and – as is usually the case with animals – goes towards fields or forests, it will be very difficult to find it. In such a situation, someone would certainly be willing to sue Apple and claim damages. After all, losing your beloved dog is much more emotional than losing your backpack or keys.

The second problem is building a locator. To get into the AirTag, all you need to do is twist the plastic case a bit. Inside is a CR2032 battery (like for a watch), which flows out of the device after opening. Apple may be concerned that the curious pet will try to find the finder or swallow it completely, and this could endanger its health. Apple has not prepared security in this regard and does not produce “animal” accessories for AirTag. Although third-party manufacturers offer bow-attachable covers and cases, it cannot be compared to specialist pet carriers, which are characterized by a more built-up structure.

Apple may also be planning to produce locators specifically for animal tracking. The “we don’t encourage, but we don’t prohibit” procedure may be aimed at surveying the territory for a new product or an improved generation of AirTag. This would lead directly to the possibility of releasing ridiculously expensive accessories for iPets.

Source: Nomad

We already know that AirTag is average for locating pets. However, there are plenty of alternatives that have features to make pet tracking safer and more effective.

What should you pay attention to when choosing an animal finder?

It would be pointless to list all makes and models of specialized trackers. There are dozens of them and the choice often depends on the type of pet. However, let’s focus on what’s important and what AirTag doesn’t have. Let’s start with the fact that Apple’s locator – unlike dedicated trackers – does not use a GPS module. As I mentioned, the location shown in the Search app is based on the signal from nearby Apple devices. If you live far from large agglomerations, this solution will be completely ineffective. It is worth paying attention to the presence of the SOS button. Specialized seekers are equipped with it in case a third party finds a pet. They are synced with the application or other types of software and when pressed they send an alert with the fastest route to reach the pet. For example, this functionality is provided by Locon Dog seekers.

The construction should be an important criterion. Light enough not to cause discomfort to the pet, but at the same time durable and closed so that the furry dog ​​cannot get in. Water resistance is also important. The animal may run away when it rains, roll through a puddle, or fall into a river. A scared dog or cat can move very dynamically. So live tracking is essential. You can forget about such accuracy in AirTag, but most animal trackers have data refreshed every few seconds. For example, this cat collar from Tractive.

Source: Tractive

So if you are concerned about the safety of your four-legged friend, it is better to skip using AirTag. Since Apple itself does not recommend the use of this product on pets, we can objectively assume that as a manufacturer, he knows what he is saying. Moreover, this solution will never be as effective as dedicated trackers, equipped with many features that AirTag does not have. It is better to attach the white pill with the bitten apple logo to your wallet. It will be more useful to him.

Stock Image from Depositphotos

Leave a Comment